Anthem Blue Cross of California Rate Hikes Spark Outcry

Anthem Blue Cross of California Rate Hikes Spark Outcry

President Obama and other proponents of the Democratic plans for health care reform are pointing to planned rate hikes for Anthem Blue Cross of California's individual policies as a case in point for overhauling the health care system.  Will provisions on medical-loss ratios and rate-increase reviews move forward?

Angela Braly, CEO of WellPoint, is heading to the hot seat on Capitol Hill on Feb. 24 to testify before the House Ways & Means Committee and its Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations about planned rate hikes at its Anthem Blue Cross unit in California.

Anthem Blue Cross recently informed many of its approximately 800,000 individual policyholders that premiums would increase by as much as 39% on March 1. Anthem also informed members that it might start adjusting premiums more often than once a year.

President Obama decried the move in a pre-Superbowl interview with Katie Couric, and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius also has called for an explanation of the rate hikes. Back in California, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner (R) — a gubernatorial hopeful — has asked for a delay to the rate hikes while an independent investigation is undertaken.

Proponents of Democratic health care reform proposals in Congress say Anthem Blue Cross’ planned rate hikes underscore the need for reform, especially in terms of rising health insurance costs.

In an explanation of the premium increases, Anthem told HHS that the recession prompted many members to suspend their policies, thus creating a smaller pool of beneficiaries.  Anthem noted that beneficiaries who retained coverage tend to have greater health needs than those who dropped benefits.

The Senate and House reform bills seek to tackle that issue by requiring people to have insurance coverage, but the cost of health care remains an issue. 

In addition, the bills would require insurers to spend set percentages of premium income on medical care or give rebates to members.  The House bill sets the percentage at 85% for all plans.  The Senate bill would require large group plans to hit the 85% threshold, but would require plans for small groups and individuals to spend only 80% of premium income on medical services.

Perhaps more appealing to supporters of the Democrats’ legislation in this case, both bills would subject rate increases to a review.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal that ran in the weekend edition, Braly did not address Anthem Blue Cross of California’s rate hikes directly, but she did explain her stance on overhaul bills in Congress, arguing that the current reform proposals don’t do enough to control the rising costs of health care services, prescription drugs and medical devices. 

Right now it’s unclear whether the medical-loss ratio and premium rate review provisions will stay in reform legislation or if provisions directly addressing costs of services, medications and devices will be beefed up. President Obama’s upcoming health care summit might help clear things up, or clarity on the issue might be farther down the road.

Criticism in the Senate

Dollars and Cents

Shaping the Debate

Polls

 

Exit mobile version