Does Medicaid Need a Checkup?

Does Medicaid Need a Checkup?

Since the start of the reform debate, questions have swirled about Medicaid's role and sustainability. New reports raise further concerns about the program's long-term prognosis.

Medicaid is at the heart of the nation’s health reform.

The program is slated to cover roughly half of the 32 million U.S. residents expected to obtain health insurance under the overhaul. However, CMS officials are not content to wait until Medicaid eligibility significantly expands in 2014 and are trying to boost program enrollment now.

A number of new reports highlight the current challenges facing Medicaid. Soaring enrollment figures and limited state funds raise worries about the program’s long-term prognosis. Moreover, many states are leaning on federal matching dollars obtained through Medicaid as an all-purpose crutch to balance their budgets. As a result, the program has needed high-profile funding infusions to help states overcome projected revenue shortfalls and prevent broad layoffs and cuts.

Program at Center of State Funding Challenges

An annual Kaiser Family Foundation survey released last week paints a concerning picture. Driven by mounting unemployment and a resulting loss of health benefits, total Medicaid enrollment rose to a record-high 48.5 million U.S. residents by the end of 2009. Program spending grew by 8.8%, which exceeded projections by nearly 25%.

The enrollment spike couldn’t have come at a worse time for states, which struggled to manage their spending in light of historic declines in revenues. Every state but Arkansas and North Dakota made cuts to some element of its Medicaid program last year. About 80% of programs scaled back or eliminated some provider payments, while two-fifths of programs dropped benefits for services like dental care and imaging.

According to Vernon Smith, a principal with Health Management Associates who co-authored the study, it could’ve been worse. Without federal stimulus funds that propped up Medicaid programs, “we would have seen cuts on a scale that we’ve never seen before,” Smith said.

Health Reform Forcing Evolution

The mounting demand for Medicaid and pending changes under reform underscore the program’s ongoing shift.

As originally conceived, Medicaid was structured as a counterweight to Medicare — an opt-in safety net that allows states considerable flexibility to determinate funding, residents’ eligibility and other measures. Today, state Medicaid programs significantly vary in benefits and reimbursement. There’s also a range in programs’ level of federal support, which is based on state residents’ average income. Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, has historically received a low federal medical assistance percentage — just 50% in 2010, while Mississippi’s was nearly 75% — pushing the state to curb care provider payments.

Health reform will force more uniformity and evolution. For example, some programs now only cover state residents with annual incomes falling below the federal poverty level, while more-generous states offer benefits to residents with significantly higher annual incomes. Beginning in 2014, the overhaul further standardizes Medicaid by raising the national eligibility floor to 133% of the FPL. Moreover, the process of determining Medicaid eligibility — which will be incorporated into the state insurance exchanges created under the overhaul — is spurring information technology modernization. The law calls for a system that allows applicants to check eligibility for Medicaid, subsidies or purchasing insurance via the exchanges in “one fell swoop.” As a result, state Medicaid directors will have to combine their programs with those of other states and insurers, a move that will pose a challenge for programs that already are underfunded and dependent on old technology.

More Challenges Await

Nearly 16% of U.S. residents are now covered by Medicaid, and another 5% are slated to gain coverage through the program within four years. While HMA’s Smith says that Medicaid “may very well be able to absorb” the ongoing enrollment increases, the program’s expanding scope has presented some new challenges.

For example, legislative interventions in Medicaid have historically been less frequent and contentious than the near-annual fights over Medicare, but its growing cost and link with the health overhaul has made Medicaid more of a political target. Some congressional Republicans this week — as part of an effort to repeal the health reform — questioned state leaders on how much it will cost to expand Medicaid coverage and meet new program requirements under the overhaul.

Spending on Medicaid also appears to increasingly conflict with other public priorities. According to Peter Orszag, who served as director of the White House Office of Management and Budget until August, states’ spending on Medicaid is crowding out their contributions to higher education. The Oklahoma Hospital Association is opposing a ballot measure to boost education spending because it will likely cause a cut in state Medicaid funds.

Meanwhile, questions about Medicaid’s long-term financing linger. HMA’s Smith notes that “there seems to be no end in sight to the fiscal pressure” on the program. While there will be ongoing federal financial support for Medicaid to expand, many observers fear that relying on these continued infusions will be ultimately unsustainable given the nation’s rising deficit.

As potential solutions, some stakeholders have floated models like converting Medicaid funds into block grants. Others suggest using the federal medical assistance percentage as a tool to force states to repay emergency federal Medicaid infusions — specifically, raising FMAP during times of economic hardship and lowering the federal contribution when states are prosperous.

Here’s a look at what else is making news in health reform.

Health Reform Rollout

Businesses in the News

Eye on November Elections

Preparing for the Overhaul

Exit mobile version