Obama Leaves Door Open to Strategy on Health Reform

Obama Leaves Door Open to Strategy on Health Reform

President Obama's State of the Union address made clear that he will not back down on health reform and that he expects lawmakers to follow suit. What isn't as clear is what path lawmakers will take to move forward.

With the status of health care reform legislation in question after Democrats lost their 60-vote, filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, many members of the party had a similar refrain: Keep an overhaul alive.

President Obama opened the chorus during his State of the Union address last week. Although much of the speech was focused on the U.S. economy, he insisted that he would not give up on passing health reform legislation.

While the president did not signal defeat, he did not detail a strategy, leaving the door open for health policy experts to weigh in. On the Health Affairs blog, three entries in recent days consider the options — using the budget reconciliation process, devising a scaled-back proposal or starting completely from scratch.

Henry Aaron, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, urges Democrats to stick with what they have and communicate the legislation’s benefits better to the public. He argues against restarting the entire process and agrees with fellow Health Affairs blogger Timothy Jost — a professor of law at Washington and Lee University — that using reconciliation is the best procedural option.

For his part, Jost cautions lawmakers from taking an incremental approach, saying that “it is not possible to unravel the reform legislation and still come up with a plan that guarantees Americans that they can keep the coverage they have if they like it and offers them coverage if they need it.”

On the other end of the spectrum, Joseph Antos, a health care scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, calls for a complete rethinking of the health reform process, positing that even using current proposals as a base for reform would be a bad move. He writes, “Taking either the Senate or House bill as a starting point will inevitably lead to arguments that a popular provision (such as guaranteed issue) will not work without other, less popular requirements (like a mandate on individuals to purchase insurance), which in turn will create the need for even more requirements.” 

In Congress, lawmakers are falling out around similar lines of thinking. House and Senate leaders already have considered several options to pass the current legislation, including having the House pass the Senate bill as is.

Although House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) previously had indicated that there were not enough votes in her chamber to pass the Senate bill unchanged, House Democrats began considering whether they could attach rider legislation with members’ preferred changes, which could then be passed in the Senate with a simple majority vote. There also has been talk of working on a scaled-back reform bill that would include some of the more popular provisions in the larger overhaul legislation.

Meanwhile, Republicans carried out a counter-message: Start over. The message was similar from senior members of the party down to the newest Republican senator.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), reacting to Obama’s SOTU address, said, “If the President is serious about real reform, he should scrap the current proposal, start over from scratch, and work with all of us in an open and transparent manner on a bill that confronts the number one concern across the country: reducing health care costs.”

While lawmakers and analysts continue to hash out the options to move forward, here’s a look at the action this week.

GOP Annual Retreat

Republican Resistance

Renewed Calls for Passage of Health Care Reform

Jobs, Economy Take Priority

Push for Smaller Health Reform Measures?

Budget Reconciliation

Health Care Reform Transparency

Exit mobile version