The Health Law

Latest California Healthline Stories

Basic Health Program: Good or Bad Idea for California?

The California Legislature is considering a proposal to create a Basic Health Program in California that would provide low-cost public health insurance for as many as one million Californians who otherwise might not qualify for subsidized coverage. We asked stakeholders and experts what California should do.

Four Myths About ObamaCare That Just Won’t Die

Has any piece of major legislation ever engendered as much misinformation? More than two years after the Affordable Care Act passed, both critics and supporters are still telling tall tales — and coming up with new ones, too.

State Loses Bid To Cut FQHC Rates, Restructure Pay System

Two budget subcommittees recently rejected an attempt by the state Department of Health Care Services to rework the way it pays federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics. The proposal included a funding cut of 10%, or about $100 million, to those centers.

Health Facilities Get Improvement Boost

The federal government yesterday issued $722 million in renovation and construction grants to community health centers, including $122 million in grants to California facilities.

Dean Germano, CEO of Shasta Community Health Center  in Redding, said his center’s $5 million capital grant announced yesterday will pay for about half of a planned $10 million building addition.

“The plans are completed, and we were waiting on a decision from HHS to see if we could do this,” Germano said.

Mixed Reviews at Basic Health Program Briefing

The state Legislature is considering a bill to create a Basic Health Program in California. If adopted, SB 703 by Ed Hernandez (D-West Covina) would create low-cost health care insurance for as many as one million low-income Californians.

One of the options offered states in the Affordable Care Act, the Basic Health Program shares some goals with the Health Benefit Exchange, though the cost of insurance is expected to be significantly lower under the BHP.

That prospect would seem to be a slam-dunk proposition for patient advocates, but it’s not as simple as that.