Return to the Full Article View You can republish this story for free. Click the "Copy HTML" button below. Questions? Get more details.

How Can Pediatricians Discuss Guns With Parents?

Many children live in houses with guns, but pediatricians often don’t feel comfortable discussing gun safety with parents — even though most parents say they would welcome that conversation.

That’s a key finding from a study published Wednesday in the Journal of Pediatrics. It comes as some state legislatures and doctors tussle over proposals restricting what doctors can say to patients about firearms, and as doctor groups increasingly push physicians to treat gun violence as a public health concern.

The paper is based on a survey of about 1,200 parents in the area surrounding St. Louis. Parents visiting their pediatrician’s office filled out a questionnaire asking whether they owned firearms, whether their children were regularly exposed to guns and how they would react if the pediatrician brought up the question of firearm safety for children.

Based on the surveys, the researchers concluded that more than a third of children lived in houses with guns, while another 14 percent were regularly in houses that had them. About 77 percent said their pediatricians didn’t ask them any questions about gun safety. But, at least when it comes to safely storing guns, three-fourths of parents said the doctor should offer some advice. Parents who owned guns were less likely to want pediatricians discussing gun safety.

“A lot of children die every year because of needless injuries — because of their curiosity. Pediatricians are not firearm safety experts for the most part, but they are experts on childhood development,” said Jane Garbutt, a professor of medicine at Washington University in St. Louis and the paper’s lead author. “Parents look to their pediatricians as their most trusted source of information about a lot of things.”

The research comes while states debate what physicians can or should say to patients about firearms. A Florida law, which bans doctors’ inquiries about guns, is currently facing a court challenge. Several other states — including Texas, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Virginia — have considered similar laws, though none passed.

Garen Wintemute, an emergency room doctor who heads the Violence Prevention Research Center at the University of California, Davis, has urged fellow physicians to put access to firearms and gun safety on the list of health factors they discuss with their patients.

Last month, the University of California announced it would earmark $5 million over five years to fund a new California Firearm Violence Research Center, to be headed by Wintemute.

Legislation to bar doctors from discussing guns with their patients is supported by the National Rifle Association, and has attracted criticism from groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, which say such measures limit physicians’ First Amendment rights and interfere with the appropriate practice of medicine.

The AAP recommends that all pediatricians ask whether families have firearms at home and, if the answer is yes, advise parents to remove them. “Unintentional injury is a real concern,” said Judith Schaecter, chairwoman of pediatrics at the University of Miami, a member of the AAP’s Council on Violence, Injury and Poison Prevention and one of the doctors challenging Florida’s law. She was not involved in the study.

The NRA did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the study, but the organization has previously argued that families visiting the doctor are looking for medical advice and it is an intrusion of privacy if physicians ask them about guns. Lawyers defending the Florida law argue its goal is to “prevent harassment and discrimination.”

The study suggests the issue is more complicated, and that there are ways pediatricians can appropriately inquire about gun safety without alienating patients, Garbutt said. For instance, when a child starts to crawl, pediatricians want to ask about whether they are ever in contact with potentially hazardous materials, like prescription medication and toxic cleaning supplies. It would be easy, she said, to add firearms to that list — grouping them with materials that may be risky without explicitly asking parents about gun ownership.

“You don’t have to ask directly about firearm ownership. You’re just asking about a firearm as a hazard,” she said.

The study finds that such questioning could bring benefits. Of survey respondents, about one in five kept their guns and ammunition together. And a quarter stored firearms loaded, which increases the odds of injury if children find them while playing, Garbutt noted.  More people are getting guns because they want them for protection, she said. That means they’re more likely to keep them readily accessible, where children could also find them.

That underscores the need for a thoughtful approach, said Eric Fleegler, an assistant professor of pediatrics and emergency medicine at Harvard Medical School, who has researched gun safety and pediatric care.

“You need to be sensitive to the needs of our patients,” said Fleegler, who was not involved in the study. “Yes, we are talking about something that some people may feel uncomfortable with, but then again, there are some patients who don’t want to talk about immunizations. There are people who don’t want to talk about domestic violence, who don’t want to talk about sex, etc. It’s up to the pediatrician to find out a way to balance this.”

One Second Amendment advocacy group questioned the findings. Because the survey is based mainly on the St. Louis area, it shouldn’t be generalized to the rest of the country, said Timothy Wheeler, director of Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership, which is operated by the Second Amendment Foundation.

But Garbutt and Fleegler noted that although the survey isn’t based on a nationally representative sample, other demographic elements — such as the number of people owning guns — mirror the rest of the country. That, they said, makes it easier to draw broader conclusions from it.

Pediatricians, meanwhile, appear skittish. Anecdotally, many said they didn’t feel comfortable discussing gun safety, Garbutt noted. That may be because they are afraid of offending patients or don’t know how to approach the conversation, she said.

And controversies like the one over the Florida law may play a role, Fleegler said. “The presence of these laws really dampens people’s willingness to have these conversations,” he said.

Meanwhile, there needs to be further investigation of how doctors should best handle these conversations, said David Hemenway, a professor of health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health and director of the university’s Injury Control Research Center, who was not involved in the study. Right now, Hemenway added, there’s no consensus on how doctors should best approach discussions of gun safety.

That matters, Garbutt said, because the absence of productive conversations keeps children at serious risk.

“There are a lot of risks for children in terms of their chance to come across a loaded firearm,” she said. “What we know from other studies is if they can find it, they will, and if they find it, they will play with it. Parents who have a gun in the home need to make absolutely sure it’s not accessible to their children.”

This story was produced by Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent program of the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Some elements may be removed from this article due to republishing restrictions. If you have questions about available photos or other content, please contact