Latest Morning Briefing Stories

DHCS Says State Is Ready for Adult Day Care Transition

Advocates for seniors and the disabled filed a motion on Saturday asking a U.S. District Court judge in San Francisco to intervene in some implementation details of the settlement agreement it signed eight months ago with the Department of Health Care Services.

State officials yesterday answered some of the questions about the Oct. 1 implementation of the Community Based Adult Services program.

Some advocates worried about confusion around the launch of the CBAS program since the state is holding training sessions for the CBAS changeover in October for both health plans and physicians.

Motion Could Delay Implementation

A court motion filed Saturday challenging the state’s implementation of a new program for adult day services raises a number of concerns about how the new legal hurdle may affect timing and appeals in the new Community Based Adult Services program.

One of the main issues revolves around the fate of approximately 2,400 former Medi-Cal beneficiaries of Adult Day Health Care services. Those frail, elderly and disabled people had been denied eligibility to the replacement CBAS program. Many of them had been denied eligibility after earlier being approved for it.

According to Elissa Gershon, attorney for Disability Rights California which filed the motion Saturday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, there are approximately 2,200 appeals of eligibility still outstanding, and roughly another 200 who have had a hearing but are still awaiting a decision.

Mental Health, Substance Abuse Treatment Changing

New guidelines in the Affordable Care Act and new responsibilities for county governments mean significant changes ahead for mental health care and substance abuse treatment in California.

Promise, Peril of Duals Program

Advocates see potential for improvement but also are concerned about consumer protections in the transition of roughly 1.1 million Californians into Medi-Cal managed care. The state is launching a managed care pilot project for beneficiaries who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program.

“This is really a critical moment in time for dual-eligibles and represents an amazing time to improve care for duals,” said Kevin Prindiville, deputy director of the National Senior Citizens Law Center office in Oakland. “But it’s also a time to be very careful and cautious about how we proceed to move forward.”

Prindiville, one of several speakers at an informational forum last month, said California is still negotiating   with CMS officials, so some of the details of the plan are still uncertain.

Too Much Focus on Medicare — and not Enough on Medicaid?

The continued focus on how Barack Obama or Mitt Romney would shape the Medicare program has become a major focus of the presidential campaign. It also means that the candidates’ deep, actual differences on Medicaid policy are being overlooked.

Keeping Providers in the Loop

With so many changes in Medi-Cal services and reimbursement rates, the state has been working on a system to constantly update and alert physicians, nurses and other providers about the latest wrinkles in Medi-Cal administration.

“We’ve never offered this before,” said Dan Nand, web content lead at Xerox State Healthcare, which is working with the state Department of Health Care Services on the updating project. “Providers have never had a chance to do this before. Now they’ll be able to read all of the announcements by desktop, or by mobile phones.”

The idea is to have a series of networks, like an advanced kind of listserv system, Nand said, in which providers can sign up for specific specialty areas, such as acupuncture or long-term care.

Safety-Net Hospitals Face Funding Cuts on Two Federal Fronts

Safety-net hospitals are facing a double-whammy of funding cuts: The Affordable Care Act lowers Medicaid payments to hospitals for uncompensated care and changes in Medicare reimbursements could mean further reductions in payments to safety-net hospitals.

Access, Clinic Finances, ED Overuse All Major Concerns for CMA

With health care reform and the state’s cutbacks and reorganization of its health care system, the practice of medicine in California is about to undergo major changes. California Medical Association officials have serious concerns about some of those changes.

“Yes, we are in a budget crunch, and yes, money is tight,” said Doug Brosnan, an emergency department physician and a member of the CMA’s board of trustees. “But there is suffering. Patients are suffering because they lack access to basic services.”

Brosnan was part of a group of CMA officials who met with reporters on Friday in Sacramento to talk about California’s recent spate of budget cuts to health programs and the outlook for reform after the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold most of the Affordable Care Act. CMA officials said they are concerned about the state’s efforts to reorganize existing services — such as the duals demonstration project, or the shift of 873,000 children from the Healthy Families program to Medi-Cal managed care.

Timeline Delineates Duals Project Tasks

The state Department of Health Care Services has released a timeline of deadlines and target dates for its Coordinated Care Initiative, also known as the duals demonstration project.

Eventually, the duals project hopes to move about one million Californians dually eligible for Medi-Cal and Medicare benefits into Medi-Cal managed care plans. The idea, state officials have said, is to provide better, more integrated care by pooling the funding sources from two disparate programs. Coordinated care could provide stronger case management, offer needed services and save state and federal dollars.

The pilot program in eight counties, beginning in March, 2013, will serve about 700,000 of the state’s dual eligibles.

How Much Will States’ Medicaid Expansions Really Cost?

State officials are wrestling with whether to join the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion, but as part of their evaluation process, many are relying on cost estimates that are not accurate.