LOS ANGELES: DECIDES NOT TO PRIVATIZE COUNTY HOSPITAL
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors will not approveThis is part of the California Healthline Daily Edition, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
the privatization of Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center,
Los Angeles Times reports. County supervisors said that their
decision not to privatize the hospital was based on an
independent report conducted by Peat Marwick LLP. The county had
originally projected that privatization would yield $40 million
in savings over seven years. However, the report, which was
released September 10, said that the projections were no longer
valid due to funding decisions by the state and federal
governments and specifics of the "proposed contract" with
Catholic Healthcare West Southern California. Specifically, the
report showed that savings from privatization would be only about
$9 million. The plan to privatize the hospital had been part of
an effort to cut $120 million from the county health system this
year; Rancho has already "sustained tens of millions in cuts
since the summer of 1995."
RESPONSES
Los Angeles Health Services Director Mark Finucane agreed
with the board's decision to hold off on privatizing Rancho. He
said, "We have explored all of those options people have asked us
to explore ... and the short answer is keeping Rancho as part of
the county system is a wise policy and a wise business decision."
Finucane noted that the state and federal governments have
allocated $26 million to Rancho, providing that the hospital
remains a public facility. However, he said the hospital will
still have to come up with "several millions of dollars worth" of
cuts this year. Finucane also said that although the federal
government had pushed for privatization, officials from the
Health Care Financing Administration "are OK" with the new
decision. He said, "They don't want us to privatize for
privatization's sake. What they want us to do is explore
alternative ways of delivering service." Finucane added that the
hospital will have to consider ways to "act more like a private
hospital in order to survive, most notably by dramatically
increasing its census count and filling about 40 chronically
empty beds in the 210-bed facility."
OTHER HOSPITALS
Finucane denied that the board of supervisors' decision
signals a "fundamental change in the direction of the health care
system." However, the Los Angeles Times notes that while the
county had been considering privatizing High Desert Hospital in
Lancaster, officials backed off those plans when "no firm
expressed interest in operating the hospital without a guaranteed
profit that would have required a significant subsidy from the
county" (Meyer, 9/17). Los Angeles County has been working for
two years to overhaul its financially strapped health care
system. Click here for two past stories on the overhaul.