CALIFORNIA: PUBLIC UNFAMILIAR WITH PATIENT PROTECTION ACTS
Two California ballot initiatives designed to protect HMOThis is part of the California Healthline Daily Edition, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
consumers "have made little impression on state voters and have
little support among those who are familiar with them," according
to a new Field Poll released yesterday (Russell, SAN FRANCISCO
CHRONICLE, 9/17). Opponents of the measures have already begun
airing "extensive TV and radio advertising broadly attacking both
propositions" (Field Institute release, 9/17). Supporters
countered with a major campaign featuring full-page ads,
infomercials and smaller print ads with emotionally charged text
(California Nurses Association/Foundation for Taxpayer and
Consumer Rights release, 9/4).
UNHEARD AND UNFAVORED: The poll found that 31% of likely
voters reported knowledge of Proposition 214, called the HMO
Patients Rights Initiative and Proposition 216, the Patient
Protection Act. Among registered voters, 28% reported having
heard or read something about the statutes. Of the likely voters
who were aware of the ballot measures, about one-third (10% of
all likely voters) were inclined to oppose the initiatives, five
percent would support them and half (16% of total) were
undecided. After being read a summary of the initiatives, 43% of
the likely voters opposed Prop. 214, while 22% supported it and
35% were undecided. For Prop. 216, 46% of the likely voters
opposed it, 19% supported it and 35% were still undecided after
hearing the summary (Field Institute release, 9/17). "A 2-to-1
reaction against is not what you want to see if you are a
promoter of an initiative," said Field pollster Mark DiCamillo.
"Typically, they like to start out with a lead, and try to hold
on," he added. DiCamillo noted that "it was unusual to ask
voters their inclinations on two measures at once, particularly
given that the supporters of each measure fiercely oppose the
other" (CHRONICLE, 9/17).
KEEP IT SIMPLE: The main objective of both propositions is
"to establish greater regulation of the way in which hospitals
and managed care health plans ... operate," according to the
survey (see AHL 9/13) (Field Institute release, 9/17). DiCamillo
noted that of all the initiatives, excluding bond issues, since
1978, only nine percent that were trailing in the September poll
were passed in the election. Since 1990, only one in three
initiatives have been approved. DiCamillo said, "Over the long
haul, voters are a little weary of highly complicated
initiatives" (CHRONICLE, 9/17).